How do you define 'bad games'?

Some games are so bad that I wonder if I have just wasted my money on them. Here are some of them:

Full Spectrum Warrior (0/10)

This game practically plays itself. The A.I aims and shoots for you. All that is needed from you is the moving of the soldiers. That, in my opinion, is boring, very boring.




Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon (1.3/10)

Extremely poor graphics bundled with very unrealistic and lousy gameplay. I really want my money back.

Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell (1.5/10)

Sorry, don't be offended, Splinter Cell fans. This game requires that you move at a very slow pace to avoid detection, so slow that gameplay seems so boring to me, so boring that I felt like conking out. This game is simply void of action.




Crimson Skies (2.0/10)

Too difficult to control the plane. Not to mention the constant boring dodging and flying.

Grabbed by the Ghoulies (1.9/10)

Another one of the crappy cartoon-like game. Be advised: For children aged 3 and below only. Oh, come on, I am not a 3-year old anymore. I need more mature games. Perhaps your baby would like this.

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3 Raven Shield (1.0/10)

No, I am not anti-Tom Clancy, but I really dislike this game. Turning on the night vision view gave me a throbbing headache after some minutes. Wait, your charcater cannot jump too. Too unrealistic is how you describe this game. Quite similar to Ghost Recon too.

Look out for the next feature: How do you define 'good games'?